CHI/DEN (VETOED 4-4)

[Deleted]

Bears send:
QB: Phillip Rivers 1.20 M (2017) 12.00 M (2018) 12.20 M (2019)


Broncos send:
2019 1st (DEN)

I'm not winning this year, but wild is and needs a starting QB. Thanks for everything Phillip, you are a class act.

[Deleted]

i really need a qb and think I can win a few games if I had 1 who starts I accept

[Deleted]

Approve

[Deleted]

Approve

[Chargers GM (Greg)]

Veto (2-1) I usually don't veto but trading a Top 15 QB on a reasonable 3 year contract for a 2019 1st is not fair compensation. I understand that Rivers has gotten off to a rocky start, and I have no problem with the Bears trading him but the compensation has to be fair. Take a look at what the Seahawks traded for Dak Prescott at blitzcentral.proboards.com/thread/4631/sea-approved-4

[Deleted]

not enough comp for a starting QB

veto
2-2

[Colts GM (Ben)]

Joe trades Rivers for less than he probably should’ve. Wild Child trades the most valuable player/asset remaining for no good reason. Everybody kind of loses and math says two negatives equal a positive.

Approve 3-2

[Buccaneers GM (Kevin)]

Can't remember if I can vote here ...

[Buccaneers GM (Kevin)]

Approve 4-2, Rivers is declining rapidly, he doesn't want to play in LA and he looks disinterested. Plus he's 35 with limited appeal going forward and currently sits at 17 and dropping in my QB ratings. Fair deal

[Deleted]

Veto for sure. A 2019 first for a starting QB? No Dice.

[Deleted]

I'm putting a knife in this deal. I agree whole-heartedly with Greg on the reasoning.

Veto.

[Chargers GM (Greg)]

TRADE VETOED WITH 4 VETOS. (4-4)